Barkhuizen v Napier

dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court against a decision of the SCA, reported as Napier v Barkhuizen 2006 (4) SA 1 (SCA); 2006 (9) BCLR 1011 (SCA).
dc.concourt.synopsis	Constitutional challenge under section 34 to a time limitation clause in a short-term insurance contract requiring the applicant to institute court proceedings within 90 days.The clause was held not to be unconstitutional or contrary to public policy. Majority: Ngcobo J (concurring Madala J, Nkabinde J, Skweyiya J, Van der Westhuizen J and Yacoob J) Separate Concurrences: O'Regan J, Langa CJ Dissents: Sachs J, Moseneke DCJ (concurring Mokgoro J)
dc.contributor.judge	Ngcobo J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge	Moseneke DCJ dissenting judgment Sachs J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge	Langa CJ separate judgment O'Regan J separate judgment
dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T17:04:53Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T17:04:53Z
dc.date.created	2006-02-14	en
dc.date.judgment	4 April 2007
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT72/05	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2007] ZACC 5
dc.identifier.citation	2007 (5) SA 323 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2007 (7) BCLR 691 (CC
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2513
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2513/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28572%20Kb%29-11056.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y
dc.title	Barkhuizen v Napier	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT72/05	en