A controversy which should never have arisen
| dc.contributor.author | Rattray, C G | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-29T10:36:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-29T10:36:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1988 | en |
| dc.description.jurisdiction | South Africa | en |
| dc.description.legislationsa | Copyright Amendment Act 13 of 1988 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (1988) DR 867 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0250-0329 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/30632 | |
| dc.language | eng | en |
| dc.publisher | De Rebus | en |
| dc.subject | Design protection | en |
| dc.subject | Copyright | en |
| dc.subject | Industrial property | en |
| dc.subject | Patent laws and legislation | en |
| dc.subject | Intellectual property | en |
| dc.title | A controversy which should never have arisen | en |
