Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:22:24Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:22:24Z
dc.date.created 2015-06-03 en
dc.identifier.citation [2016] ZACC 1
dc.identifier.citation (2016) 37 ILJ 564 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2016 (3) BCLR 311 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2016 (3) SA 251 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3804
dc.title Steenkamp and Others v Edcon Limited (National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa Intervening) en
dc.title.alternative CCT46-15; CCT47-15 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT46/15; en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT47/15
dc.contributor.judge Cameron J
dc.date.judgment 22 January 2016
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3804/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28513%20Kb%29-23738.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.casehistory Labour Relations Act — dismissal for operational requirements — non-compliance with section 189A(8) — premature notices of termination — dismissal not invalid but may be unfair — requirements of section 189A(8) relating to procedural fairness — LRA remedy for LRA breach not common law remedy — workers to use LRA mechanisms — remedies in section 189A(8)(9) and (13) adequate — reinstatement not competent for invalid dismissal — appeal from LAC — application dismissed Minority judgment — section 189A(7) and (8) create a dismissalfree zone — dismissals in breach of section 189A invalid


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account