Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:17:04Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:17:04Z
dc.date.created 2013-12-12 en
dc.identifier.citation [2013] ZACC 47
dc.identifier.citation 2014 (3) BCLR 306 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3744
dc.title Director-General Department of Home Affairs and Another v Mukhamadiva en
dc.title.alternative CCT61/13 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT61/13 en
dc.contributor.judge Moseneke DCJ
dc.date.judgment 12 December 2013
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3744/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28195%20Kb%29-21921.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for leave to appeal concerning the appealability of a decision of the High Court. The Court refused the application for leave to appeal. The Court held that there was no live dispute requiring resolution and that the appeal would have no practical effect on the parties or public at large. Notwithstanding the significance of the Court’s duties and powers in terms of section 172 of the Constitution, it held that, there were no further compelling reasons to grant leave to appeal. Judgment: Moseneke DCJ (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Western Cape High Court. See earlier judgments: Mukhamadiva v Director General of Home Affairs and Another (22621/11) [2011] ZAWCHC 483 (21 November 2011) and Mukhamadiva v Director_General Department of Home Affairs and Another (22621/2011) [2012] ZAWCHC 337 (23 October 2012).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account