Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-08T10:50:00Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-08T10:50:00Z
dc.identifier.citation [2022] ZACC 19
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36859
dc.title Liqhayiya Tuta v The State en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 308/20
dc.date.hearing 8 February 2022
dc.contributor.judge Unterhalter AJ (majority)
dc.contributor.judge Kollapen J (dissenting)
dc.date.judgment 31 May 2022 [REASONS FOR ORDER]
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36859/%5bJudgment%5d%20CCT%20308-20%20Tuta%20v%20S.pdf?sequence=92&isAllowed=y REASONS FOR ORDER
dc.concourt.synopsis Jurisdiction — oral submissions — arguable point of law — application of incorrect legal test — no prejudice arising Extempore judgment — ambiguity in judgment — rules of interpretation — rights of the accused Putative private defence — application of incorrect legal test — misapplication of established legal principle — arguable point of law


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account