| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-08T10:50:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-08T10:50:00Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2022] ZACC 19 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36859 | |
| dc.title | Liqhayiya Tuta v The State | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 308/20 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 8 February 2022 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Unterhalter AJ (majority) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Kollapen J (dissenting) | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 May 2022 [REASONS FOR ORDER] | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36859/%5bJudgment%5d%20CCT%20308-20%20Tuta%20v%20S.pdf?sequence=92&isAllowed=y REASONS FOR ORDER | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Jurisdiction — oral submissions — arguable point of law — application of incorrect legal test — no prejudice arising Extempore judgment — ambiguity in judgment — rules of interpretation — rights of the accused Putative private defence — application of incorrect legal test — misapplication of established legal principle — arguable point of law |