CCT 308/20

[2022] ZACC 19

Unterhalter AJ (majority)

Kollapen J (dissenting)

8 February 2022

31 May 2022 [REASONS FOR ORDER]

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36859

Jurisdiction — oral submissions — arguable point of law — application of incorrect legal test — no prejudice arising Extempore judgment — ambiguity in judgment — rules of interpretation — rights of the accused Putative private defence — application of incorrect legal test — misapplication of established legal principle — arguable point of law