Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:15:45Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:15:45Z
dc.date.created 2012-08-08 en
dc.identifier.citation [2012] ZACC 20
dc.identifier.citation 2012 (12) BCLR 1340 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3684
dc.title Minister for Transport and Another v Mvumvu and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT62/12 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT62/12 en
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J
dc.date.judgment 27 September 2012
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3684/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%2871%20Kb%29-19639.pdf?sequence=10&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Reasons furnished for the earlier order granted on an urgent basis to extend a period of suspension fixed by this Court in Minister of Transport and Another v Mvumvu and Another 2011 (2) SA 473 (CC). In that case, specified parts of the Road Accident Fund Act were declared unconstitutional and Parliament was ordered to cure the defect by 17 August 2012. The Minister applied to extend the period of suspension for a further three months as Parliament was unable to enact remedial legislation within the period. The Court granted an extension of the period of suspension by a further six months because the explanation was sufficient and it was just and equitable to do so. Judgment: Jafta J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Applicants launched an application on an urgent basis for an order varying and extending the period of suspension fixed by this Court in the earlier judgment: Mvumvu and Others v Minister for Transport and Another [2011] ZACC 1; 2011 (2) SA 473 (CC); 2011 (5) BCLR 488 (CC).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account