Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:02:58Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:02:58Z
dc.date.created 2004-10-26 en
dc.identifier.citation [2004] ZACC 4
dc.identifier.citation 2005 (5) SA 429 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2004 (8) BCLR 805 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation [2004] 7 BLLR 623 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2215
dc.title Dudley v City of Cape Town and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT5/04 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT5/04 en
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 20 May 2004
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2215/Full%20judgment%2020%20May%202004%20%2843%20Kb%29-2173.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for leave to appeal. The Court previously held, unanimously, that the application should be dismissed. The respondent attempted to file a further affidavit, late and without complying with Rules for service and filing, in which a costs order against the applicant was sought. This judgment was delivered to give reasons why no order was made as to costs.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court from a decision of the Labour Court. Application refused.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account