Dudley v City of Cape Town and Another

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T17:02:58Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T17:02:58Z
dc.date.created	2004-10-26	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2004] ZACC 4
dc.identifier.citation	2005 (5) SA 429 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2004 (8) BCLR 805 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	[2004] 7 BLLR 623 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2215
dc.title	Dudley v City of Cape Town and Another	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT5/04	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT5/04	en
dc.contributor.judge	The Court
dc.date.judgment	20 May 2004
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2215/Full%20judgment%2020%20May%202004%20%2843%20Kb%29-2173.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Application for leave to appeal. The Court previously held, unanimously, that the application should be dismissed. The respondent attempted to file a further affidavit, late and without complying with Rules for service and filing, in which a costs order against the applicant was sought. This judgment was delivered to give reasons why no order was made as to costs.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for leave to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court from a decision of the Labour Court. Application refused.

Files in this item

Full judgment 20 May 2004 (43 Kb)-2173.pdf ( 42.80Kb )

Full judgment 15 June 2004 (25 Kb)-2174.pdf ( 24.02Kb )