Mercer v S

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T17:02:13Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T17:02:13Z
dc.date.created	2004-01-26	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2003] ZACC 22
dc.identifier.citation	2004 (2) SA 598 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2004 (2) BCLR 109 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2197
dc.title	Mercer v S	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT43/03	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT43/03	en
dc.contributor.judge	The Court
dc.date.judgment	24 November 2003
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2197/Full%20judgment%20%28111%20Kb%29-1162.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Case concerning the constitutionality of the Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance. A decision by the Court found it improper to hear this matter until the High Court had heard it. Leave to appeal was dismissed.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for leave to appeal against judgment of Northern Cape High Court - S v Mercer and Another 2003 (6) BCLR 616 (NC). Applicant had previously applied directly to Constitutional Court for relief; Constitutional Court dismissed application and refered matter back to the High Court: Ex Parte Mercer and Another 2003 (1) SA 203 (CC).

Files in this item

Full judgment (111 Kb)-1162.pdf ( 111.7Kb )

Summary of judgment-1163.pdf ( 82.17Kb )