Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:01:29Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:01:29Z
dc.date.created 2003-11-17 en
dc.identifier.citation [2002] ZACC 24
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (1) SA 533 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2003 (1) BCLR 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2158
dc.title African National Congress v United Democratic Movement and Others (Krog and Others Intervening) en
dc.title.alternative CCT43/02 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT43/02 en
dc.date.hearing 11 November 2002
dc.contributor.judge Chaskalson CJ
dc.date.judgment 19 November 2002
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2158/Full%20judgment%20%28222%20Kb%29-22361.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis expired 5 members of the KwaZulu-Natal provincial legislature who crossed were replaced. In a unanimous decision by Chaskalson CJ, the court stressed that there has to be finality in litigation otherwise there would be uncertainty in the lower courts. In addition, the Court's power to vary its own order should be used sparingly. Lastly, the judgment found there to be no ambiguity in its order and therefore no need to clarify.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for direct access to Constitutional Court to vary an order in the judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court in United Democratic Movement v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (1) 2003 (1) SA 495 (CC) ; 2002 (11) BCLR 1179 (CC).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account