| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:01:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:01:29Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2003-11-17 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2002] ZACC 24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2003 (1) SA 533 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2003 (1) BCLR 1 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2158 | |
| dc.title | African National Congress v United Democratic Movement and Others (Krog and Others Intervening) | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT43/02 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT43/02 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 11 November 2002 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Chaskalson CJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 19 November 2002 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2158/Full%20judgment%20%28222%20Kb%29-22361.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | expired 5 members of the KwaZulu-Natal provincial legislature who crossed were replaced. In a unanimous decision by Chaskalson CJ, the court stressed that there has to be finality in litigation otherwise there would be uncertainty in the lower courts. In addition, the Court's power to vary its own order should be used sparingly. Lastly, the judgment found there to be no ambiguity in its order and therefore no need to clarify. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for direct access to Constitutional Court to vary an order in the judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court in United Democratic Movement v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (1) 2003 (1) SA 495 (CC) ; 2002 (11) BCLR 1179 (CC). |