Mkangeli and Others v Joubert and Others

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:59:44Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:59:44Z
dc.date.created	2003-12-02	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2001] ZACC 15
dc.identifier.citation	2001 (2) SA 1191 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2001 (4) BCLR 316 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2110
dc.title	Mkangeli and Others v Joubert and Others	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT61/00	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT61/00	en
dc.contributor.judge	Chaskalson P
dc.date.judgment	6 March 2001
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2110/Full%20judgment%20%28143%20Kb%29-13483.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Application for direct access refused on the grounds that the matter had not yet been heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal. Held that the High Court finding that various provisions of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 92 of 1997 were unconstitutional was, in fact, obiter and it was not therefore necessary to consider confirmation. Maj: Chaskalson P (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for leave to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court against a decision of the Witwatersrand High Court.

Files in this item

Full judgment (143 Kb)-13483.pdf ( 292Kb )

Summary of judgment-19385.pdf ( 15.89Kb )

Summary of judgment-19386.pdf ( 67.46Kb )

Summary of judgment-19387.pdf ( 58.26Kb )

Summary of judgment-18860.pdf ( 67.97Kb )

Summary of judgment-18861.pdf ( 45.07Kb )