Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T16:59:42Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T16:59:42Z
dc.date.created 2004-12-08 en
dc.identifier.citation [2000] ZACC 10
dc.identifier.citation 2000 (3) SA 705 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2000 (8) BCLR 886 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2106
dc.title South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union and Others v Irvin & Johnson Ltd en
dc.title.alternative CCT2/00 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT2/00 en
dc.date.hearing 18 May 2000
dc.contributor.judge Cameron AJ Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Mokgoro J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge Sachs J dissenting judgment
dc.date.judgment 9 June 2000
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2106/Full%20judgment%20%28387%20Kb%29-2744.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Appeal from the decision of the Labour Appeal Court not to grant a recusal application. The majority (Cameron AJ) held that a party applying for the recusal of a judge bears the onus of rebutting the presumption of judicial impartiality and must, at the hearing, adduce convincing evidence of a reasonable apprehension of bias. In a dissent, Mokgoro and Sachs JJ found that the test was whether a lay litigant in the position of the parties would reasonably have apprehended bias.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal from a decision in the Labour Appeal Court reported (2000) 21 ILJ 330, the merits of the appeal being argued simultaneously, applications for leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account