Brummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others

dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:58:49Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:58:49Z
dc.date.created	2004-09-29	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2000] ZACC 3
dc.identifier.citation	2000 (5) BCLR 465 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2000 (2) SA 837 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2068
dc.title	Brummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT45/99	en
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT45/99	en
dc.date.hearing
dc.contributor.judge	Yacoob J
dc.date.judgment	30 March 2000
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2068/Full%20judgment%20%28111%20Kb%29-1467.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Constitutionality of the laws that permit a party to pending legal proceedings or some other person to purchase the right of another in those proceedings for the sole purpose of terminating the litigation. Right of access to court. Applicant sought condonation for late application. Yacoob J for a unanimous Court dismissed the condonation application.
dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for special leave to appeal against the High Court judgment : Brummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd 1997 (2) SA 411 (T), and order of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Brummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd 1999 (3) SA 389 (SCA), and an application for condonation of the late noting of application for leave to appeal.

Files in this item

Full judgment (111 Kb)-1467.pdf ( 111.5Kb )

Answering Affidavit-2726.pdf ( 84.83Kb )

Notice of Motion-2727.pdf ( 70.25Kb )

Transvaal Provincial Division judgment-2729.pdf ( 79.66Kb )

Supreme Court of Appeal judgment-2730.pdf ( 145.2Kb )