| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T16:56:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T16:56:48Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2004-11-30 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1996] ZACC 14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1996 (7) BCLR 899 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1996 (4) SA 313 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2025 | |
| dc.title | S v Julies | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT7/96 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT7/96 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | Kriegler J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 11 June 1996 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2025/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2011%20June%201996.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Section 21(1)(a)(iii) of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act which provided that a person found in possession of a dependence producing substance was presumed to be dealing in that substance declared unconstitutional. Presumption of innocence, no rational connection. Maj: Kriegler J (unanimous). | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Adjudication of a referral to the Constitutional Court by the High Court regarding the constitutionality of s 21(1)(a)(iii) of Act 140 of 1992, relevant section declared unconstitutional. |