The defence of conduct of a third party in view of the rationale for strict liability in terms of the pauperien action revisited
| dc.contributor.author | Van der Merwe, C G | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-29T10:49:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-29T10:49:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1994 | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Lever v Purdy (1993) 3 SA 17 (A) | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Purdy v Lever 1991 (3) SA 431 (T) | en |
| dc.description.jurisdiction | General | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (1994) 111 SALJ 47 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0258-2503 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals/soaf&collection=journals | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/30999 | |
| dc.language | eng | en |
| dc.publisher | South African Law Journal | en |
| dc.subject | Domestic animals | en |
| dc.subject | Liability for animals | en |
| dc.subject | Strict liability | en |
| dc.subject | Third parties | en |
| dc.title | The defence of conduct of a third party in view of the rationale for strict liability in terms of the pauperien action revisited | en |