Prince v President Cape Law Society and Others

Prince v President Cape Law Society and Others

dc.concourt.casehistory	Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Prince v President Cape Law Society 2000 (3) SA 845 (SCA) ; 2000 (7) BCLR 823 (SCA), dismissing an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Prince v President Cape Law Society 1998 (8) BCLR 976 (C), Constitutional Court granted leave to deliver further evidence.
dc.concourt.synopsis	Rastafarian applicant alleging that criminal prohibition on use and possession of cannabis infringed the right to freely practice his religion. The court requested the parties to submit further evidence on affidavit as to the justifiability of the limitation. Section 12(1)(b) of Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959 (quorum of SCA judges when considering the validity of an Act of Parliament) declared inconsistent with the interim Constitution and invalid from 27 April 1994. Maj: Ngcobo J (unanimous).
dc.contributor.judge	Ngcobo J
dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T16:59:49Z
dc.date.created	2004-01-28	en
dc.date.hearing	16 November 2000
dc.date.judgment	12 December 2000
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT36/00A	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2000] ZACC 28
dc.identifier.citation	2001 (2) SA 388 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2001 (2) BCLR 133 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2120
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2120/Full%20judgment%20%28253%20Kb%29-1250.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.title	Prince v President Cape Law Society and Others	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT36/00A	en