A limit on the limit on interest? The in duplum rule and the public policy backdrop
| dc.contributor.author | Vessio, M L | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-29T10:20:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-29T10:20:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Verulam Medicentre (Pty) Ltd v Ethekweni 2005 (2) SA 451 (D) | en |
| dc.description.jurisdiction | South Africa | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2006) 39 DJ 25 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1466-3597 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/15465 | |
| dc.language | eng | en |
| dc.publisher | De Jure | en |
| dc.subject | Interest and usury | en |
| dc.subject | Debtor and creditor | en |
| dc.subject | Words and phrases - in duplum rule | en |
| dc.title | A limit on the limit on interest? The in duplum rule and the public policy backdrop | en |