African National Congress v United Democratic Movement and Others (Krog and Others Intervening)

dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for direct access to Constitutional Court to vary an order in the judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court in United Democratic Movement v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (1) 2003 (1) SA 495 (CC) ; 2002 (11) BCLR 1179 (CC).
dc.concourt.synopsis	expired 5 members of the KwaZulu-Natal provincial legislature who crossed were replaced. In a unanimous decision by Chaskalson CJ, the court stressed that there has to be finality in litigation otherwise there would be uncertainty in the lower courts. In addition, the Court's power to vary its own order should be used sparingly. Lastly, the judgment found there to be no ambiguity in its order and therefore no need to clarify.
dc.contributor.judge	Chaskalson CJ
dc.date.accessioned	2017-04-08T17:01:29Z
dc.date.available	2017-04-08T17:01:29Z
dc.date.created	2003-11-17	en
dc.date.hearing	11 November 2002
dc.date.judgment	19 November 2002
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT43/02	en
dc.identifier.citation	[2002] ZACC 24
dc.identifier.citation	2003 (1) SA 533 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2003 (1) BCLR 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/2158
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2158/Full%20judgment%20%28222%20Kb%29-22361.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.title	African National Congress v United Democratic Movement and Others (Krog and Others Intervening)	en
dc.title.alternative	CCT43/02	en