Die verweer van lokvinkbetrapping in die Engelse reg : 'n nuwe wending? R v Looseley Attorney-Generals Reference (No 3 of 2000) 2002 Crim LR 301 (HL)
| dc.contributor.author | Labuschagne, J M T | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-29T10:16:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-29T10:16:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | R v Looseley Attorney-Generals Reference (No 3 of 2000) 2002 Crim LR 301 (HL) | en |
| dc.description.jurisdiction | Great Britain | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2003) 66 THRHR 297 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/11252 | |
| dc.language | afr | en |
| dc.publisher | Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg | en |
| dc.subject | R v Looseley Attorney-Generals Reference (No 3 of 2000) 2002 Crim LR 301 (HL) | en |
| dc.subject | Entrapment (Criminal law) - Great Britain | en |
| dc.title | Die verweer van lokvinkbetrapping in die Engelse reg : 'n nuwe wending? R v Looseley Attorney-Generals Reference (No 3 of 2000) 2002 Crim LR 301 (HL) | en |