CCspace

Vorderingsregte as onliggaamlike sake waarom nie?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorScott, Sen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-29T10:29:12Z
dc.date.available2017-05-29T10:29:12Z
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.description.citationssaMorkel v Holm (1883-84) 2 SC 57 63en
dc.description.citationssaWetzlar v The General Insurance Co (1884) 3 SC 86 88en
dc.description.citationssaBrummer v Gorfil Brothers Investments (Pty) Ltd 1999 3 SA 389 (HHA) 399Een
dc.description.citationssaUniversiteit van Pretoria v Tommie Meyer Films (Edms) Bpk 1977 4 SA 376 (T)en
dc.description.jurisdictionSouth Africaen
dc.identifier.citation(2010) 73 THRHR 629en
dc.identifier.issn1682-4490en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/24345
dc.languageengen
dc.publisherTydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Regen
dc.subjectLaw of cessionen
dc.titleVorderingsregte as onliggaamlike sake waarom nie?en

Files

Collections

iSalpi