Pre-emption agreements and the myth of the "trigger event" as any manifestation of a decision to sell : a response to Deeksha Bhana
| dc.contributor.author | Naude', T | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-29T10:29:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-29T10:29:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Hirschowitz v Moolman 1985 3 SA 739 (A) 762F | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Van Aardt v Weehuizen 2006 4 SA 401 (N) | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Robinson v Randfontein Estate Gold Mining Co Ltd 1921 AD 168 188 | en |
| dc.description.citationssa | Hunter v Cumnor Investments 1952 1 SA 735 (C) 740 | en |
| dc.description.jurisdiction | South Africa | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2011) 74 THRHR 87 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-4490 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/24567 | |
| dc.language | eng | en |
| dc.publisher | Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg | en |
| dc.subject | Pre-emption contracts | en |
| dc.title | Pre-emption agreements and the myth of the "trigger event" as any manifestation of a decision to sell : a response to Deeksha Bhana | en |