From ambivalence to certainty: norms and principles for the structural interdict in socio-economic rights litigation in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorMbazira, C.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-29T10:27:10Z
dc.date.available2017-05-29T10:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.description.citationssaDoucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia [2003] 3 SCR 3en
dc.description.citationssaMinister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign 2002 (5) 721 (CC)en
dc.description.citationssaOccupiers of 51 Olivia Road, Berea Township and 197 Main Street, Johannesburg v City of Johannesburg 2008 (3) SA 208 (CC)en
dc.description.citationssaEN v Goverment of RSA [2007] (1) BCLR 84 (D)en
dc.description.jurisdictionSouth Africaen
dc.identifier.citation(2008) 24 SAJHR 1en
dc.identifier.issn0258-7203en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/22735
dc.languageengen
dc.publisherSouth African Journal on Human Rightsen
dc.subjectInterdict (Civil law)en
dc.subjectSupervisory ordersen
dc.subjectSouth Africa. Constitutional Courten
dc.subjectSocial justiceen
dc.subjectAIDS Law Projecten
dc.subjectRemediesen
dc.subjectSocio-economic rightsen
dc.subjectSouth Africa. High Courten
dc.titleFrom ambivalence to certainty: norms and principles for the structural interdict in socio-economic rights litigation in South Africaen

Files

Collections