| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-17T12:01:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-17T12:01:25Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (9) BCLR 1216 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3904 | |
| dc.title | Limpopo Legal Solutions and Others v Vhembe District Municipality and Others | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT159/16 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT159/16 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 18 May 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3904/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2017%20May%202017.pdf?sequence=15&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | application for direct appeal — general costs rule in constitutional litigation — exceptional circumstances — inquiry on the appropriateness of the proceedings — abuse of process constitutional litigation — leave to appeal granted — High Court misdirected itself by not applying the Biowatch principle — a basis exists to interfere with the High Court’s exercise of a discretion | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Urgent application for leave to appeal directly to the CC against a judgment of the Limpopo Local Division, Thohoyandou High Court: Limpopo Legal Solutions v Vhembe District Municipality [2016] ZALMPTHC 20 delivered 2 June 2016. |