Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-17T12:01:25Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-17T12:01:25Z
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 14
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (9) BCLR 1216 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3904
dc.title Limpopo Legal Solutions and Others v Vhembe District Municipality and Others en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT159/16
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT159/16
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 18 May 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3904/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2017%20May%202017.pdf?sequence=15&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis application for direct appeal — general costs rule in constitutional litigation — exceptional circumstances — inquiry on the appropriateness of the proceedings — abuse of process constitutional litigation — leave to appeal granted — High Court misdirected itself by not applying the Biowatch principle — a basis exists to interfere with the High Court’s exercise of a discretion
dc.concourt.casehistory Urgent application for leave to appeal directly to the CC against a judgment of the Limpopo Local Division, Thohoyandou High Court: Limpopo Legal Solutions v Vhembe District Municipality [2016] ZALMPTHC 20 delivered 2 June 2016.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account