Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-24T11:44:08Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-24T11:44:08Z
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 10
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (7) BCLR 815 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (1) SA 369 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3897
dc.title Hotz and Others v University of Cape Town en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT280/16
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 12 April 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3897/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2012%20April%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Right to education — Right to freedom of expression — Right to assembly, demonstration, picket and petition — Right to freedom of association Remedial powers of the Constitutional Court — Exercise of judicial discretion in awarding costs — Instances in which an appeal court may interfere with a discretionary order — Application of the Biowatch principle on costs — Failure to 2 exercise discretion judicially in the constitutional context — Application to tender further evidence — Further evidence unnecessary to determine the issue on costs.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account