| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-24T11:44:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-24T11:44:08Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (7) BCLR 815 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (1) SA 369 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3897 | |
| dc.title | Hotz and Others v University of Cape Town | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT280/16 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 12 April 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3897/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2012%20April%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Right to education — Right to freedom of expression — Right to assembly, demonstration, picket and petition — Right to freedom of association Remedial powers of the Constitutional Court — Exercise of judicial discretion in awarding costs — Instances in which an appeal court may interfere with a discretionary order — Application of the Biowatch principle on costs — Failure to 2 exercise discretion judicially in the constitutional context — Application to tender further evidence — Further evidence unnecessary to determine the issue on costs. |