| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-23T21:00:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-23T21:00:21Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2018] ZACC 18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (9) BCLR 1029 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (6) SA 1 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (2) SACR 607 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3894 | |
| dc.title | Booysen v Minister of Safety and Security | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT25/17 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT25/17 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 22 August 2017 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Mhlantla J Majority judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Zondo DCJ separate judgment | |
| dc.date.judgment | 27 June 2018 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3894/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2027%20June%202018.pdf?sequence=28&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Delict — vicarious liability — deviation case — police officer — domestic violence — police firearm | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the SCA: Minister of Safety & Security v Booysen (35/2016) [2016] ZASCA 201 (9 December 2016). The case was first heard in the Grahamstown High Court: Booysen v Minister of Safety and Security (2915/2013) [2015] ZAECGHC 56 (15 May 2015). |