| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-23T16:02:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-23T16:02:47Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 37 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (12) BCLR 1528 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (1) SA 335 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3892 | |
| dc.title | Member of the Executive Council for Health and Social Development Gauteng v DZ obo WZ (Member of the Executive Council for Health Eastern Cape and Member of the Executive Council for Health Western Cape as Amici Curiae) | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT20/17 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT20/17 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 17 August 2017 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J Majority judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Jafta J separate judgment | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 October 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3892/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2031%20October%202017.pdf?sequence=47&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Delictual damages — “once and for all” rule — future medical expenses — lump sum award Section 39(2) of the Constitution — Section 173 of the Constitution — factual basis for development of the common law | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the SCA: MEC for Health and Social Development of the Gauteng Provincial Government v DZ: [2016] ZASCA 185 (30 November 2016). |