Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:26:18Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:26:18Z
dc.date.created 2017-02-28 en
dc.identifier.citation [2018] ZACC 7
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (5) BCLR 527 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation [2018] 6 BLLR 531 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation (2018) 39 ILJ 1213 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3888
dc.title Food and Allied Workers Union obo Gaoshubelwe and Others v Pieman's Pantry (Pty) Limited en
dc.title.alternative CCT236/16 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT236/16 en
dc.date.hearing 3 August 2017
dc.contributor.judge Kollapen AJ Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Zondo DCJ separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Zondi AJ separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 20 March 2018
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3888/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2020%20March%202018.pdf?sequence=27&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis interpretation — Labour Relations Act — unfair dismissal claims — applicability of Prescription Act Prescription — interruption — referral to conciliation process
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the Labour Appeal Court: Food and Allied Workers Union on behalf of Gaoshubelwe v Pieman’s Pantry (Pty) Ltd (JA20/2015) [2016] ZALAC 46; [2016] 12 BLLR 1175 (LAC); (2017) 38 ILJ 132 (LAC) (8 September 2016). The case was first heard in the Johannesburg Labour Court: FAWU obo Gaoshubelwe and Others v Piemans Pantry (Pty) Ltd (JS243/05) [2014] ZALCJHB 319 (15 August 2014).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account