Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:26:17Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:26:17Z
dc.date.created 2017-02-16 en
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 43
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (2) BCLR 157 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3885
dc.title Municipal Employees Pension Fund v Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund (Superannuation) and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT260/16 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT260/16 en
dc.date.hearing 25 May 2017
dc.contributor.judge Mhlantla J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J dissenting judgment
dc.contributor.judge Madlanga J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 1 December 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3885/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%201%20December%202017.pdf?sequence=34&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis pension funds — right to association — constitutional challenge to validity of regulations creating pension funds — municipalities’ rights and authority in relation to local government matters
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against an order of the SCA: Municipal Employees Pension Fund v Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund (Superannuation) and Others (562/2015) [2016] ZASCA 139; [2016] 4 All SA 761 (SCA) (29 September 2016). The case was previously heard in the Pietermaritzburg High Court: Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund (Superannuation) and Others v Municipal Employees Pension Fund and Others, unreported Case No 3144/2013 (6 October 2014) .


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account