| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:26:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:26:15Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2016-12-06 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 33 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (11) BCLR 1443 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (5) SA 22 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3880 | |
| dc.title | Mtokonya v Minister of Police | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT200/16 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT200/16 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 16 March 2017 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Zondo J Majority judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Jafta J dissenting judgment | |
| dc.date.judgment | 19 September 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3880/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2019%20September%202017.pdf?sequence=35&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | [knowledge required by section 12(3) of Prescription Act] — [knowledge of legal conclusion or that creditor has a legal remedy not required by section 12(3)] — [only knowledge of identity of debtor and facts giving rise to debt required] [leave to appeal is granted] — [appeal is dismissed] — [no order as to costs] | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Mthatha High Court: Mtokonya v Minister of Police (1057/14) [2015] ZAECMHC 67 (23 September 2015). The High Court and the SCA dismissed the applicant’s application for leave to appeal. |