| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:26:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:26:09Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2016-11-15 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 35 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (11) BCLR 1408 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (1) SA 1 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3874 | |
| dc.title | Matjhabeng Local Municipality v Eskom Holdings Limited and Others; Mkhonto and Others v Compensation Solutions (Pty) Limited | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT217/15 | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT99/16 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT217/15 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT99/16 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 2 March 2017 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Nkabinde ADCJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 26 September 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3874/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2026%20September%202017.pdf?sequence=61&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | contempt of court — requisites for contempt — standard of proof in civil and criminal contempt proceedings — appropriateness of summary procedure in contempt proceedings — non-joinder —duty to comply with court orders. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal the decisions of the Free State High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal: Matjhabeng Local Municipality v Eskom Holdings Limited unreported judgment of the High Court of South Africa, Free State Division, Bloemfontein, Case No 924/13 (19 February 2015) and Compensation Solutions (Pty) Ltd v Compensation Commissioner [2016] ZASCA 59; (2016) 37 ILJ 1625 (SCA). |