| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:26:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:26:06Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2016-08-29 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 42 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (2) BCLR 119 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (2) SA 327 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3871 | |
| dc.title | Dladla and Others v City of Johannesburg and Another (Centre for Applied Legal Studies and Centre for Child Law as Amici Curiae) | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT124/16 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT124/16 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 16 February 2017 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Mhlantla J Majority judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Cameron J separate judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Jafta J separate judgment | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Madlanga J separate judgment | |
| dc.date.judgment | 1 December 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3871/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%201%20December%202017.pdf?sequence=55&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Temporary housing accommodation — constitutionality of Shelter rules — requirement that residents leave during day — prohibition on opposite-sex partners living together — Shelter rules unlawfully limited sections 10, 12 and 14 of the Constitution | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal is against an order of the SCA: City of Johannesburg v Dladla and Others (403/2015) [2016] ZASCA 66; 2016 (6) SA 377 (SCA) (18 May 2016). The case was previously heard in the Johannesburg High Court: Dlaldla and Others v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Another (39502/12) [2014] ZAGPJHC 211; 2014 (6) SA 516 (GJ); [2014] 4 All SA 51 (GJ) (22 August 2014). |