Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:26:04Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:26:04Z
dc.date.created 2016-08-08 en
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 27
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (2) SACR 535 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (11) BCLR 1357 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3868
dc.title Barlow v S en
dc.title.alternative CCT233/15 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT233/15 en
dc.date.hearing 7 March 2017
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Zondo J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 3 August 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3868/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%203%20August%202017.pdf?sequence=31&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for leave to appeal — no prospects of success — not in the interests of justice to grant leave — application is dismissed Section 35(3)(a) of the Constitution — right to be informed of charge with sufficient detail to answer to it — inadvertent omission — detail given in the course of judgment —no violation Section 35(3)(o) — right to appeal — no express consideration — no reason to interfere with factual finding of trial Court — no violation
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Johannesburg High Court: Barlow v S (A365/2012) [2015] ZAGPJHC 318 (30 January 2015)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account