Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:25:59Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:25:59Z
dc.date.created 2016-07-19 en
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 15
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (7) BCLR 916 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (5) SA 9 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3863
dc.title Off-Beat Holiday Club and Another v Sanbonani Holiday Spa Shareblock Limited and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT106/16 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT106/16 en
dc.date.hearing 29 November 2016
dc.contributor.judge Mhlantla J Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Madlanga J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 23 May 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3863/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2023%20May%202017.pdf?sequence=23&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Prescription — claims brought under section 252 of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 do not constitute “debts” in terms of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 — matter remitted to High Court for consideration of section 252 claim
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a decision of the SCA: Off-Beat Holiday Club v Sanbonani Holiday Spa Shareblock Ltd [2016] ZASCA 62; 2016 (6) SA 181 (SCA). The case was first heard in the Pretoria High Court: Off-Beat Holiday Club v Sanbonani Holiday Spa Share Block Limited [2014] ZAGPPHC 418.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account