Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2025-07-29T12:42:15Z
dc.date.available 2025-07-29T12:42:15Z
dc.date.issued 2025-07-29
dc.identifier.citation [2025] ZACC 21
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38630
dc.title Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma v President of the Republic of South Africa en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT206/25
dc.date.hearing 30 July 2025
dc.contributor.judge Mathopo J
dc.date.judgment 03 October 2025
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/65581/[Judgment]%20CCT%20206-25%20Jacob%20Gedleyihlekisa%20Zuma%20and%20Another%20v%20President%20of%20the%20Republic%20of%20South%20Africa%20and%20Others.pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis Exclusive jurisdiction under section 167(4)(e) of the Constitution — direct access under section 167(6)(a) of the Constitution — conduct of the President — distinction between exercise of constitutional powers and failure to fulfil constitutional obligations — pleaded case insufficient to ground exclusive jurisdiction or direct access — no order as to costs
dc.date.ordered 31 July 2025


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account