| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-08T08:47:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-08T08:47:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2025] ZACC 25 | |
| dc.title | South Africa Riding for the Disabled Association v Regional Land Claims Commission, Western Cape and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 379/24 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 02 September 2025 (Tuesday) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Kollapen J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 13 November 2025 | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Land — land reform — restitution — claim — right to intervene of lawful occupier — may intervene only for purpose of determining compensation — Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994 — section 35(9) Practice — judgments and orders — whether previous order was interlocutory — order final in effect — previous order finally determined standing Rescission — absence of application for rescission — functus officio Parties — locus standi — what constitutes — standing previously determined — applicant lacking legal standing | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On application for direct leave to appeal from the Land Court of South Africa, Randburg | |
| dc.link.order | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/65806/[Final%20Judgment]%20CCT%20379-24%20SARDA%20v%20RLCC%20and%20Others.pdf |