| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-19T04:58:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-19T04:58:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2025] ZACC 11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38618 | |
| dc.title | Mavundla v Gotcha Security Services (Pty) Limited. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT170/24 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Goosen AJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 18 June 2025 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/65158/[Judgment]%20CCT%20170-24%20Ernest%20Mavundla%20v%20Gotcha%20Security%20Services%20(Pty%20)%20Ltd.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 — reinstatement of dismissed employee — claim for arrear remuneration — delay in factual reinstatement due to dispute about conditions imposed by employer — Labour Court order compelling unconditional reinstatement — employee entitled to claim arrear remuneration from original date of reinstatement | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On application for leave to appeal from the Labour Court |