| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:24:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:24:03Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2017-03-02 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 6 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] 5 BLLR 439 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2017) 38 ILJ 1273 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (7) BCLR 839 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (1) SA 82 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3860 | |
| dc.title | Mogaila v Coca Cola Fortune (Pty) Limited | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT76/16 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT76/16 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 2 March 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3860/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28206%20Kb%29-27096.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Direct access — Labour Relations Act, 1995 — Prescription Act, 1969 — dismissal dispute — arbitration award — order of reinstatement — prescription of arbitration award Direct access granted — meaning of “debt” — Myathaza applicable — order of reinstatement did not prescribe | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application to the CC for direct access in terms of section 167(b)(a) of the Constitution. |