| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-24T07:43:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-24T07:43:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-04-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2025] ZACC 5 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38605 | |
| dc.title | Shaynaz Prithilal v Akani Egoli (Pty) Limited and Another | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | Case CCT 290/24 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Rogers J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 24 April 2025 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/64962/CCT%20290-24%20Shaynaz%20Prithilal%20v%20Akani%20(Pty)%20Limited%20and%20Another.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Attorney and client costs — Court’s duty to give reasons — sections 1(c) and 34 of the Constitution | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On application for leave to appeal from the High Court, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg: |