| dc.identifier.citation | ZACC 6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38598 | |
| dc.title | Richard Timothy Harris N.O & Others v Herold Gie & Broadhead | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 295/24 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 13 May 2025 (Tuesday) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Goosen AJ (minority): [1] to [65] | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Majiedt J (majority): [66] to [106] | |
| dc.date.judgment | 13 February 2026 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/66139/[Judgment%20]%20CCT%20295-24%20Harris%20NO%20v%20Herold%20Gie%20Broadhead%2013%2002%202026.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Housing Development Schemes Act 65 of 1988 — section 6 — repayment of entrusted funds — remedy against errant attorneys | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On application for leave to appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town): |