Show simple item record

dc.identifier.citation [2026] ZACC 11
dc.title SACCAWU v Massmart Holdings and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 145/24
dc.date.hearing 06 May 2025 (Tuesday)
dc.contributor.judge Dambuza AJ (minority)
dc.contributor.judge Majiedt J (majority)
dc.date.judgment 25 March 2026
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/66206/[Judgment]%20SACCAWU%20v%20Massmart%20%2025%2003%202026.pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 — interpretation of section 68(1)(b) — claim for payment of just and equitable compensation — loss attributable to conduct occurring during picketing — picketing in furtherance of a protected strike Section 69(12) — interpretation — picketing as conduct in furtherance of a strike under section 68(1) Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to consider claim for just and equitable compensation in protected strikes — only High Court may consider such claims based on delict
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Labour Appeal Court (hearing an appeal from the Labour Court, Johannesburg):


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account