| dc.identifier.citation | [2026] ZACC 11 | |
| dc.title | SACCAWU v Massmart Holdings and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 145/24 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 06 May 2025 (Tuesday) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Dambuza AJ (minority) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Majiedt J (majority) | |
| dc.date.judgment | 25 March 2026 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/66206/[Judgment]%20SACCAWU%20v%20Massmart%20%2025%2003%202026.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 — interpretation of section 68(1)(b) — claim for payment of just and equitable compensation — loss attributable to conduct occurring during picketing — picketing in furtherance of a protected strike Section 69(12) — interpretation — picketing as conduct in furtherance of a strike under section 68(1) Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to consider claim for just and equitable compensation in protected strikes — only High Court may consider such claims based on delict | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the Labour Appeal Court (hearing an appeal from the Labour Court, Johannesburg): |