| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:24:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:24:01Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2016-12-20 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2016] ZACC 48 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (8) BCLR 1039 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3857 | |
| dc.title | Psychological Society of South Africa v Qwelane and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT226/16 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT226/16 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 14 December 2016 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3857/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28215%20Kb%29-25848.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | leave to appeal — order of postponement — due process — audi alteram partem — legal standing of applicant who was an amicus curiae in Court a quo leave to appeal refused — discretion to grant postponement not exercised judicially — but not in interests of justice to intervene — circumstances may, in public interest, warrant acknowledging legal standing of the amicus curiae to seek leave to appeal | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Aapplication for leave to appeal against an order of postponement granted by the Johannesburg High Court: Qwelane v Minister of Justice And Constitutional development and Another (36314/13) [2014] ZAGPJHC 334; 2015 (2) SA 493 (GJ) (21 November 2014) |