Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:24:01Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:24:01Z
dc.date.created 2016-12-20 en
dc.identifier.citation [2016] ZACC 48
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (8) BCLR 1039 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3857
dc.title Psychological Society of South Africa v Qwelane and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT226/16 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT226/16 en
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 14 December 2016
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3857/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28215%20Kb%29-25848.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis leave to appeal — order of postponement — due process — audi alteram partem — legal standing of applicant who was an amicus curiae in Court a quo leave to appeal refused — discretion to grant postponement not exercised judicially — but not in interests of justice to intervene — circumstances may, in public interest, warrant acknowledging legal standing of the amicus curiae to seek leave to appeal
dc.concourt.casehistory Aapplication for leave to appeal against an order of postponement granted by the Johannesburg High Court: Qwelane v Minister of Justice And Constitutional development and Another (36314/13) [2014] ZAGPJHC 334; 2015 (2) SA 493 (GJ) (21 November 2014)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account