| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:23:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:23:59Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2016-11-30 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2016] ZACC 45 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (1) SA 645 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (4) BCLR 445 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3856 | |
| dc.title | Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister in the Presidency and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT120/16 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT120/16 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 1 December 2016 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3856/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28192%20Kb%29-25662.pdf?sequence=11&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | appeal against costs order only — general costs rule in constitutional litigation — exceptional circumstances — inquiry on the appropriateness of the proceedings — abuse of process —— High Court’s discretion to award costs award of costs in a constitutional matter raises a constitutional issue — leave to appeal granted — High Court exercised its discretion judicially — no basis to interfere with High Court’s exercise of a discretion | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal directly to the CC in terms of section 167(6)(b) of the Constitution against the costs order of the Pretoria High Court:: Lawyers for Human Rights v Minster in the Presidency and Others (44151/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1150 (23 June 2015) |