Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:23:53Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:23:53Z
dc.date.created 2016-08-24 en
dc.identifier.citation [2016] ZACC 25
dc.identifier.citation 2016 (11) BCLR 1429 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (3) SA 119 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3849
dc.title Nkabinde and Another v Judicial Service Commission and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT122/16 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT122/16 en
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 24 August 2016
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3849/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%2870%20Kb%29-24749.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for rescission of order of Court – Justices of the Constitutional Court disqualified to sit in Colleagues’ matter – no quoram – Court unable to adjudicate matter – matter cannot be left pending indefinitely before Court – principle in Hlophe v Freedom Under Law applicable – Rule 42 of Uniform Rules of 2 Court not applicable for rescission of order made at Conference – Applicants knew procedure for application for leave to appeal – Rule 19(3) – argument to be in affidavits – Rule 19(6) – Court may summarily dismiss application for leave to appeal – application dismissed.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for the rescission of an order of the CC made on 16 May 2016. The CC order was made in an application for leave to appeal against a decision of the SCA that went against the applicants: Nkabinde and Another v Judicial Service Commission [2016] ZASCA 12; 2016 (4) SA 1 (SCA).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account