dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:23:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:23:52Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-08-02 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | [2016] ZACC 34 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (1) SA 255 (CC) | |
dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (2) BCLR 131 (CC) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3848 | |
dc.title | Absa Bank Limited v Moore and Another | en |
dc.title.alternative | CCT03/16 | en |
dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT03/16 | en |
dc.contributor.judge | Cameron J | |
dc.date.judgment | 21 October 2016 | |
dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3848/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28248%20Kb%29-25327.pdf?sequence=17&isAllowed=y | |
dc.concourt.synopsis | reinstatement of mortgage bonds cancelled as a result of a fraudulent scheme — validity of cancellation — unjustified enrichment claim against the mortgagor whose debt was extinguished in the course of the fraud — proprietary remedy for unjustified enrichment claim bond debt validly discharged — mortgage bonds accessory to debt — lack of evidence to support enrichment claim |