Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-08T16:59:36Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-08T16:59:36Z
dc.date.issued 2024-08-22
dc.identifier.citation [2025] ZACC 14
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38413
dc.title Shepstone and Wylie Attorneys v Abraham Johannes De Witt N.O and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 171/23
dc.date.hearing 22 August 2024 (Thursday)
dc.contributor.judge Tolmay AJ
dc.date.judgment 01 August 2025
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/65315/CCT%20171-23%20Shepstone%20and%20Wylie%20Attorneys%20v%20Abraham%20Johannes%20de%20Witt%20N.O.%20and%20Others.pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis Trust law — whether trust bound by suretyship agreement — decision made at quorate meeting in absence of one trustee — interpretation of trust deed — distinction between unanimous-decision trusts and majority-decision trusts
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Division, Pietermaritzburg)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account