Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-08T16:43:09Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-08T16:43:09Z
dc.date.issued 2024-08-15
dc.identifier.citation [2025] ZACC 2
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38411
dc.title (a) Forge Packaging (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South Africa Revenue Service; (b) United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service; (c) Rappa Resources (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services; (d) Lueven Metals (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue & (e) Absa Bank Limited & United Towers (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 66/23
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 94/23
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 98/23
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 320/23
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 72/24
dc.date.hearing 15 August 2024 (Thursday)
dc.contributor.judge Rogers J
dc.date.judgment 31 March 2025
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/64886/Judgment%20CCT%2094-23%20United%20Manganese%20of%20Kalahari%20(Pty)%20Limited%20v%20CSARS%20and%20four%20other%20cases.pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis Section 105 of Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 — test for granting a direction — relevant considerations in granting or refusing direction — discretionary nature of power to grant direction — production of rule 53 record pending direction Peremption of appeal — relevant factors in overlooking
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria):


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account