Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-08T16:27:54Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-08T16:27:54Z
dc.date.issued 2024-08-05
dc.identifier.citation [2025] ZACC 3
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38409
dc.title CSARS v Richards Bay Coal Terminal en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT104/23
dc.date.hearing 05 August 2024 (Monday)
dc.contributor.judge Kollapen J
dc.date.judgment 31 March 2025
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/65071/[Final%20Judgment]%20CCT%20104-23%20CSARS%20v%20RBCT%20(amended%20counsel%20details).pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis Customs and Excise Act 91 of 1964 — tariff determination — section 47(9)(e) — wide appeal — review in terms of Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000, section 33 of the Constitution, or alternatively, the principle of legality — rule 53 record — rule 30A application —— review jurisdiction — whether taxpayer confined to a wide appeal.
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban):


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account