Dion Rademeyer v Thomas Ignatius Ferreira

dc.date.accessioned	2024-05-03T06:15:42Z
dc.date.available	2024-05-03T06:15:42Z
dc.date.issued	2024-04-03
dc.identifier.citation	[2024] ZACC 24
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38365
dc.title	Dion Rademeyer v Thomas Ignatius Ferreira	en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT 184/22
dc.date.hearing	09 May 2024 (Thursday)
dc.contributor.judge	Mathopo J
dc.date.judgment	25 October 2024
dc.link.judgment	https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/64390/[Judgment]%20CCT%20184-22%20Rademeyer%20v%20Ferreira.pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis	Prescription Act 68 of 1969 — sale agreement — same cause of action — breach of contract — specific performance — right to claim damages
dc.concourt.casehistory	On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division, Gqeberha)

Files in this item

1.Application.pdf ( 2.803Mb )

2. Applicants First Written Submissions.pdf ( 1.609Mb )

3. Applicants Second Written Submission.pdf ( 295.8Kb )

4. Respondents Answering Affidavit.pdf ( 7.671Mb )

5. Respondents First Written Submissions.PDF ( 193.6Kb )

6. Respondents Second Written Submissions.pdf ( 1.221Mb )

[Judgment] CCT 184-22 Rademeyer v Ferreira.pdf ( 499.9Kb )

[Media Summary] CCT 184- 22 Dion Rademeyer v Thomas Ignatius Ferreira.pdf ( 151.1Kb )