Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:22:58Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:22:58Z
dc.date.created 2016-07-25 en
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 1
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (6) BCLR 750 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3831
dc.title Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality v Germiston Municipal Retirement Fund en
dc.title.alternative CCT226/15 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT226/15 en
dc.contributor.judge Nkabinde ADCJ (majority)
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J (minority)
dc.date.judgment 17 January 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3831/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28296%20Kb%29-26084.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Pension fund rule — Jurisdiction — Reconsideration of interpretation of the pension fund rule based on “new” evidence — Can a municipality’s constitutional obligations override its liability in terms of the rule — Enforcement of the rule — Whether it offends public policy — Whether a Pension Fund Board has a duty of good faith toward the Municipality (employer) — No rigid adherence to the requirements of res iudicata


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account