| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-16T06:24:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-16T06:24:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-10-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2024] ZACC 10 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38294 | |
| dc.title | City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality In re: Unlawful Occupiers 1 Argyl Street and Others v Rolandt Holdings CC and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 228/22 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 23 November 2023 (Thursday) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Dodson AJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 May 2024 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/63583/[Judgment]%20CCT228-22%20City%20of%20Ekurhuleni%20Metropolitan%20Municipality%20In%20Re%20Unlawful%20Occupiers%201%20Argyl%20Street%20and%20Others%20v%20Rohlandt%20Holdings%20CC%20and%20Others%20-%20Copy.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Condonation — late filing of application for leave to appeal, record and written submissions — lengthy delay in filing of record criticised — importance of issues raised and public interest justifying airing of dispute and granting of condonation Consent order — order recording settlement reached between parties — requirements for grant of such order — order related to lis between parties — consistent with Constitution, law and public policy – holding some practical or legitimate advantage for parties Consent order — non-compliance with requirements for grant of such order — consent order unrelated to lis, inconsistent with Constitution, Local Government: Municipal Structures Act 117 of 1998 and Local Government Ordinance 17 of 1939 and holding no practical or legitimate advantage — attorney lacking authority to consent to order Rescission of consent order — delay in seeking — requirements for grant of rescission at common law — residual discretion to refuse Costs — unsatisfactorily explained delays — costs not following suit | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg |